Misc
HEALTH
International Advocates for Health Freedom - http://www.iahf.com/index1.html
Alliance for Health Freedom - Australia - http://www.ahf-au.org/
http://www.fluoridation.com/
http://www.flouridealert.org/
Herbs - Natural Solutions Foundation - Nutricide - CODEX - www.healthfreedomusa.org
TGA - CODEX - NZ
WE BECOME SILENT - 28m
documentary on the CODEX – the erosion of alternative HEALTH
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=451097355502728465
40 min 7 sec Nutricide
Criminalizing Natural Health, Vitamins & Herbs - CODEX
http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=-5266884912495233634
POLITICS
Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee - http://www.larouchepac.com/
The New Citizen - Citizens Electoral Council of Australia - http://www.cecaust.com.au
COMPUTERS
2GB free offsite backup service
LEGAL - FEE SIMPLE - COUNCIL - TAX
http://www.brumbywatchaustralia.com/Principality01.htm
http://www.thestrategy.org.au/
AUS TAX - is it legal?
Firstly, what is a State?
A state is a group of people who by mutual consent have agreed to band
together for certain purposes, like defence, provision of social services
etcetera and do so usually in accordance with a document or instrument. This
is known as the Constitution of a corporation, or body corporate, and the
Australian Constitution if considered in this light is valid, in full force
and a marvellous document.
It must also be considered in the light of the underlying matrix of laws,
which were in place when it was made as an instrument at law. The Australian
corporations created by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900,
and its 9th section, it is not a Schedule, but an intrinsic part of the
entire instrument, occupy the geographic area defined in Section 8, and are
made up of the voting members or shareholders in these corporations.
You, as a citizen, or subject, who vote, are, subject to your right to
judicially review whatever legislation is passed by the Parliaments, are
bound by legislation made on your behalf by delegates. If it is outside the
boundary, or mere stones governing the subjects which the legislature can
enact, it is ultra vires (outside power) and is not a Law.
Pick up your Constitution and look at Section 52 Placitum (ii) the Taxation
power and it says: Taxation, but so as not to discriminate between States
and parts of States. You as an individual are an intrinsic and essential
part of the State of NSW, and also of the Commonwealth, the seventh State.
You cannot be discriminated against, and any legislation that discriminates
is outside power, and need not be obeyed. In this way, you put them on
notice to prove to you, and not only you, but by Section 80 Constitution, to
prove to 12 similar parts of the State, that the current taxation regime
treats you the same as it treats everyone else.
Despite pretences to the contrary, and the fiction that we are already a
republic, all prosecutions must be conducted in the name of the Crown. The
DPP is simply an agent of the Crown, of somewhat dubious ancestry, but even
it is bound by the decisions of the High Court, and the High Court has made
it clear that what is called the golden thread, runs through the law of this
country.
The Golden Thread is that the Crown, in prosecuting a citizen, must strictly
prove every element of the offence in order to succeed. One of those
elements is the validity of the creation of the Australian Tax Office,
because if it is not validly created it cannot direct the DPP to prosecute.
The next element that must be strictly proved, (beyond reasonable doubt) is
that the Income Tax Act is valid. It was expanded in the second World War,
when the special powers granted in wartime, under section 51 placitum (vi)
provided the head of power, to support it, and when challenged in 1946, the
High Court held that it was still valid because the war still had to be paid
for. It has not been challenged since.
I believe you must ask the ATO to strictly prove that the current Tax Act
does not fall foul of the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights. The High Court is in denial that this is validly legislated, but the
evidence is overwhelming.
In 1981 Fraser incorporated it into Australian Law with a five year sunset
clause, in that it lapsed unless confirmed in five years. In 1986, the then
Labor Government enacted it into the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Act
1986 as schedule 2. They then passed the Australian Bill of Rights and a
Bill to repeal and relocate the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights . neither of these two Bills were submitted to the Governor
General but the operative part of the Bill of rights, the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights remains as schedule 2 to the Human
Rights and Equal Opportunity Act 1986. The ATO must prove, (which they
cannot) that this Act was never passed to continue to prosecute you in a
Magistrates Court. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
is authorised under the foreign affairs power.
If the ATO cannot prove the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights is not law, and with it being defined as the Covenant in the
Criminal Code Act 1995 Dictionary, and the Criminal Code Act 1995 being the
only Act that governs criminal prosecutions, then you cannot be tried
summarily, but MUST be indicted, and Section 80 Australian Constitution
comes into play.
That means that the Commonwealth must strictly prove to 12 ordinary
Australians just like you, that the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights is not a law, and that the Tax Act does not discriminate
between different classes of Australians. Of course it cannot prove that,
because it levies different levels of Tax depending on your income, so the
whole Act is invalid. Section 51 Placitum (ii). There are other laws that
impact. As a Schedule the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights is law by reference to section 12 and 13 Acts Interpretation Act
1901,(CTH). By Section 9.5 Criminal Code Act 1995 once you claim your right
to be indicted no single justice has any further part to play except to
commit you to trial before a Judge and jury. You must by article 26 ICCPR
be treated the same as a rapist or murderer, and tried in exactly the same
type of Court.
I am prepared to prepare all the authorities you will need to rely upon,
High Court and other authorities, and make available all the legislation, or
show you where to find it.
Section 64 Judiciary Act 1903 ( Cth) declares the Commonwealth to be in
law, a juristic person equal in every way to every other. I promised that
dill Ruddock and told that other loser Latham, that there would need to be
Tax reform on the agenda this Parliament, irrespective of who won.
I do not know if you are a Christian, but I am and am appalled at the
destruction of a system we, as Protestant Christians developed over 700
years, has been destroyed in 30 years since 1972. Her Majesty ELIZABETH THE
SECOND, is the representative of the Lord. As such She owns everything, and
in wartime, can take it all, provided she pay for it , for defence. In
peacetime, she must not take your property, by the Habeas Corpus Act 1640
(16 CAR 1 c 10) (IMP) ( one of the underlying matrix laws,) unless She first
asks a jury of your peers if She is entitled to it. You see, the Habeas
Corpus Act 1640 (16 CAR 1 c 10) (IMP) in section 3 says the Queen and Her
Privies, ( which includes the members of parliament and all judges,
magistrates and public servants who work for Her, ( The Crown) ) shall have
no jurisdiction over any mans Estate.
The disregard of this led to the secession of the American Colonies, but it
is still law here, because , despite its purported repeal in 1970, its
repeal is forbidden by section 128 Australian Constitution and Sections
106-109. It became Australian Law by Section 118 Australian Constitution on
the 9th July 1900, along with the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
1900.
Whenever this is put to the ATO they find an excuse to not proceed further.
Above article by Peter Gargan from: http://phorums.com.au/showthread.php?t=77283
Email this page